Audiothinktank, Oct 2012

Well, I can safely say that I didn’t get in a time machine and head 10 years into the future, unless I did and had my memory erased . . . But, I was really pleased with the way the Audiothinktank session at PLASA turned out. I’d like to extend a massive thanks to everyone who braved the LED screens and gadgetry to attend on Monday 10 September. I can’t believe we ran out of time. To be honest, I was a little worried I’d have too much time, so prepared loads of slides so we’d have plenty to talk about. As it goes, we had lots to talk about anyway, so only managed to get through half of the slides.

The panel was fantastic, and I think added a really valuable element to the whole thing. We had Chris McCarron of Silentgig, Tony Andrews of Funktion-One, Chuck Knowledge of Chucknology and Luke Ramsey of Julie’s Bicycle.

Our first discussion on the road to betterisation was on sustainability. Seeing the biggest summer ice cap melt this year since we first started watching, and according to bushy-eyebrowed scientists, it’s quite feasible we’ll see a complete melt in a few years. So our energy usage is something that we should keep looking at.

I suppose, as an industry on the whole, we are pretty bad at looking after the environment, but how can our little audio section help? With the introduction of digital consoles, power consumption at front-of- house and on stage has been reduced, but now we see so many more consoles everywhere. On another power consuming note, we explored the possibility of putting efficiency ratings on audio equipment, including PA systems. Think about it: if you have a super-efficient PA, you require fewer boxes, therefore less truck space and fewer amplifiers.

What about the power consumption from not having your filters in your system set properly? As your DJ turns up the bottom-end pot on his Pioneer in a futile attempt to recreate 13Hz, is this using more power than needed? Your speakers will fall apart at the thought of it and your amps will cower at the amplitude placed before them. Just thinking a little more about your filtering could help conserve power. Also in the high-end: if the PA can’t reproduce it, why have it there? How much harder do the amps have to work, only to be given the shove at the speaker box? I don’t have any facts or figures for you, but it did make me think.

Something I hadn’t thought of before this session was the impact of actually getting to the shows. This obviously isn’t solely an audio problem, but a point well raised. It’s not just the punters but also the way we travel as artists and crew. Every band will have its own means of transport, and as you work your way up the bill, splitter buses become tour buses, then tour buses and trucks, then when you reach the headliners, you could easily be looking at multiple busses and trucks – all in the name of entertainment.

Now, I do understand the practical necessity of having all this in place – you are able to get your gear in and out as you need to – but it’s something to think about. One of the audience members from Copenhagen told us that they run a Facebook group offering rides to and from festivals for those that have extra space in their vehicles.

We then moved on to creativity, which, as some of you know, is quite close to my heart. The question posed was along the lines of: ‘Have digital consoles taken away our creativity’? Being from the old skool, I like my analogue desks, and have my artistic palette laid out in front of me. The younger generation get their heads around the digital much faster then us oldies . . . So is this a problem? Maybe not. Maybe it’s our attitude that needs to develop. One opinion expressed was that teaching on analogue console gives you a much better understanding of signal flow . . .

The sound of digital audio is very different, so the needs of mix engineers are changing, from DSP requirements to A/D and D/A conversation. Maybe this is a far more clinical world than we are use to, but the tools available are getting better and better. The outlook for the future of sound systems, I think, could be really exciting, but we are walking a difficult path that can lead to fixing problems with more processing – which is probably not the way to go.

I put an idea tree in the middle of PLASA. The point was to get questions and comments on all things audio. Obviously, a stand- alone object in the middle of a floor with pens and post-it notes attached to it, it was open for abuse. Yes, I’m sure Liam loves lighting, and thank you Dean and Christian for your lovely smiley faces, but we did have some interesting questions: What do wordclocks do for sound quality? I’ve become a firm believer in wordclocks. I tried one out last year and it was as if a sheet had been lifted off the PA. The choir went from being a choir to lots of voices singing in unison. The brushes hitting the snare turned to individual pieces of brush. So I think they do a lot – but I’m not sure the cost can be justified.

All in all, I had a great time this year. Thanks for your conversations and your input. I’m looking forward to doing this again.

Share

What comes first, passion or knowledge?

When I fell into my first proper job as an engineer, I knew very little about what I should actually do. I was asked to mix a theatre show which a director I knew was putting on at the local Theatre Royal. I turned up full of passion and with a patchy knowledge of an old Allen & Heath analogue desk and the most basic of signal path from mic to speaker. I was confronted by a Yamaha LS9-32 and 12-ways of Trantec S5.3 radios with Sennheiser MKE-2 lavalier mics. Oh and a 10 piece Orchestra…

Fortunately for me, the venue was pretty small and the nature of the old theatre meant that micing the orchestra was unnecessary; I just had to keep the mics (firstly) audible and (secondly) natural sounding. I fumbled my way through the week long run learning by trial and error, as to how I could get the vocals sounding remotely warm and natural. I’d never used lavalier microphones before so I didn’t know that their omni-directional pick-up pattern meant that I would be met by plenty of phasing issues between actors, which wouldn’t go away unless I line-mixed or at least dipped the offending mic, as appropriate, during dialogue. Finding myself in the deep end also taught me quickly how to EQ out the most offensive frequencies.

Before this show I had mainly mixed bands at college. The combination of poor playing, a reflective room, a long-unserviced console and a small PA meant that learning EQ techniques was very difficult (read as “impossible”) as there was so much reflection (or plain unpleasant noise) you rarely heard anything worth attempting to EQ. That and the constant fight with the guitarists (i’m allowed to say this, I WAS one) to turn their amps down on the matchbox sized stage.

As I was studying music at college, part of my course covered recording technology which covered DAW’s, signal flow and basic micing & mixing techniques; there was, however, no Live Sound module and so everything I did in the theatre that week was either an educated guess, based on what I might do in the studio or just plain luck.

The show went alright. So ‘alright’ in actual fact, that a few months later I was offered a job mixing a bigger show on tour. I can’t help but feel though, that it was pure passion that got me through that week and left me standing at the end of it. The knowledge for me, came second to passion and I continue to learn on every job I do and every book I read. I like to admit that there is still an awful lot I don’t yet know and I always look forward to getting back off tour and working with hire companies & venues or in warehouses preparing the rigs and building racks in an attempt to enhance my knowledge of patch, build and system design. It’s an area which is all too easy to gloss over by having an experienced production engineer or sound designer on hand with the flow diagrams…

How might things have turned out it I had the knowledge but no passion?

Share

Audiothinktank at Plasa

I must firstly apologise for my silence over the last month or so. I have been busy beavering on the program for the Audiothinktank. Things like getting the panel together, working on the content, that sort if thing…

Well, that day is finally nearly upon us. Tomorrow, myself, Tony Andrews, Chris McCarron, Chuck Knowledge and Luke Ramsey will embark on a voyage of sonic discovery. Well maybe that’s a little far fetched but I hope not too far.

I’m now off to find my idea tree and place it somewhere!

Hope to see some of you tomorrow.

Dx

Share

Feature Interview: Dave Swallow (PLASA 2012)

Read Interview on the PLASA website here

“I like to embrace digital technology but it’s not the most creative tool in the box yet. With a bit of guidance I’m sure it can be.”

Author and sound engineer Dave Swallow takes the lead in the Audio Think Tank at PLASA 2012 as he asks the question: ‘If you had the chance to mould the future, what would you do?’ Described as a forum ‘made by sound engineers for sound engineers’, the Audio Think Tank is designed to generate new and radical ideas about the shape of audio to come. Originally Swallow’s brainchild, he explains how the interactive site came about, “I decided to setup a little thing where engineers could come and talk about sound-type things. A small spark of inspiration can be infectious, soon developing into a realistic idea that can be transformed into something tangible. I like to think of myself as nurturing that conversation.”
(more…)

Share